![]() ![]() Variations of the survey were then tested extensively in experiments involving thousands of UK and US participants. "We encourage our fellow psychologists to embrace AI and help steer the technology in beneficial directions," said MIST co-author Dr Friedrich Götz.įor the MIST, an international committee of misinformation experts whittled down the true and false headline selections. However, a nother recent study by the same team used GPT to produce useful questions for a variety of psychological surveys. As researchers dedicated to fighting misinformation, it was eye-opening and alarming," said Dr Rakoen Maertens, MIST lead author. The AI generated thousands of fake headlines in a matter of seconds. "When we needed a set of convincing but false headlines, we turned to GPT technology. To create false but confusingly credible headlines – similar to misinformation encountered "in the wild" – in an unbiased way, researchers used artificial intelligence: ChatGPT version 2. The Cambridge team developed assessment tools that enabled them to work out the right level and mix of fake and genuine headlines to produce the most reliable results.Įxamples of real news came from outlets such as the Pew Research Center and Reuters. That is what our test provides," said van der Linden, author of the new book Foolproof. "To understand where and how best to fight misinformation, we need a unified way of measuring susceptibility to fake news. "We are seeing how online falsehoods create polarised belief systems in major nations, and the consequences, such as the attempted Capitol Hill insurrection." "Misinformation is one of the biggest challenges facing democracies in the digital age," said Prof Sander van der Linden, senior author of the MIST study, and head of the Cambridge Social Decision-Making Lab. Selecting true or false against 20 headlines gives the user a set of scores and a "resilience" ranking that compares them to the wider US population. Researchers want the public to test themselves. The study presenting the validated MIST is published in the journal Behavior Research Methods, and the polling is released today on the YouGov US website. This runs counter to prevailing public attitudes regarding online misinformation spread, say researchers – that older, less digitally-savvy "boomers" are more likely to be taken in by fake news. However, the polling found that younger adults are worse than older adults at identifying false headlines, and that the more time someone spent online recreationally, the less likely they were to be able to tell real news from misinformation. The first survey to use the new 20-point test, called 'MIST' by researchers and developed using an early version of ChatGPT, has found that – on average – adult US citizens correctly classified two-thirds (65%) of headlines they were shown as either real or fake. The test, proven to work through a series of experiments involving over 8,000 participants taking place over two years, has been deployed by polling organisation YouGov to determine how susceptible Americans are to fake headlines. University of Cambridge psychologists have developed the first validated "misinformation susceptibility test": a quick two-minute quiz that gives a solid indication of how vulnerable a person is to being duped by the kind of fabricated news that floods online spaces. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |